S
Participants who put the work in
These accounts come from people who completed the Ulmarud business planning programme and applied what they learned in real situations. None of them had a finished plan before they started. Each one describes a specific problem they were trying to solve, what the workshop gave them, and what changed as a result — without embellishment.
Three accounts worth reading carefully
A plan that held up under scrutiny from a bank
Oisín came to the programme managing a family-owned retail group with three locations and a fourth under consideration. The business had been running for over a decade, but the financial documentation was informal — spreadsheets, verbal agreements with suppliers, and projections that had never been stress-tested. When the bank asked for a formal business plan as part of a property loan application, the gaps became visible immediately.
The workshop sessions on financial modelling and assumption documentation gave him a structured way to rebuild the projections from scratch. He spent roughly six weeks after the programme rewriting the plan, using the cash flow templates and the scenario analysis framework covered in module four. The loan application was approved eight months after he first enrolled. He is careful to note that the bank's decision involved many factors beyond the document itself.
"I had numbers, but I couldn't explain the logic behind them. The programme forced me to document every assumption — which was uncomfortable but turned out to be exactly what the bank needed to see."
Presenting to investors without overpromising
Priya had been advising early-stage founders for several years before she decided to raise seed funding for her own consultancy. She found that the assumptions she made confidently for clients were harder to defend when applied to her own numbers. The programme's module on market sizing and competitive positioning helped her identify where her projections were speculative and where they were grounded. She presented to three investors; one agreed to proceed to due diligence.
"Writing a plan for yourself is different from writing one for a client. The workshop gave me a framework that made me honest about what I actually knew versus what I was guessing."
Scenario planning for a regional development application
Tomasz and his co-founder were applying to a regional enterprise fund in the midlands. The application required a three-year operational plan with clearly defined milestones and contingency thinking. Their original draft was optimistic in a way that felt unconvincing even to them. After completing the scenario planning module, they rebuilt the plan around three distinct growth paths — conservative, base, and stretched — each with different cost and revenue assumptions.
"Showing the fund that we had thought through the downside scenario was more persuasive than our best-case numbers. That framing came directly from the workshop."
What the programme actually covers
The accounts above share a common thread: each participant arrived with a gap between what they had written and what they needed to defend. The programme is structured around closing that gap through repeated drafting, peer review, and structured critique — not through templates alone.